An explosive new investigation has unveiled allegations of unauthorized use of an autopen for signing executive actions under the Biden administration.

Energy expert Daniel Turner has brought forward claims that point towards unauthorized climate-related actions bearing autopen signatures, potentially without former President Joe Biden's knowledge, as Breitbart reports.

Turner, founder of the pro-American energy watchdog organization Power the Future, is at the center of these revelations. His investigation asserts that members of the White House have been using an autopen to approve major climate-related executive orders without direct authorization from President Joe Biden.

According to Turner, at least eight significant actions were signed using an autopen. Some notable measures include a Jan. 6 offshore drilling prohibition and a March 2023 ban on arctic drilling.

This accusation casts a shadow on the administration's handling of these crucial policy decisions.

Concerns raised about Biden's awareness

The probe is supported by findings from other reports, such as one from the Heritage Foundation. Their March 2025 document indicates that almost all of Biden’s documents bore an autopen signature, save for one. These findings add credibility to Turner's claims of impropriety.

Additionally, a recent book by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, titled Original Sin, claimed a cover-up regarding President Biden's mental health. Turner suggests this could implicate further misconduct within the highest levels of government.

Turner and his advocacy group have reached out to numerous agencies and Senate committees in pursuit of a formal inquiry. "These processes...deserve a good, thorough investigation," Turner has stated, underscoring the need for transparency.

Allegations of evasion among Cabinet members

One particular instance criticized by Turner involves the export prohibition on liquefied natural gas (LNG). He contends that this decision was not only detrimental to American interests, but it also benefited foreign nations like Russia.

House Speaker Mike Johnson shared these concerns, stating that President Biden was unaware of such an executive order regarding LNG exports. This evokes questions concerning the administration's operational integrity.

Turner also expressed concerns about at least one member of Biden’s Cabinet, specifically former Interior Secretary Deb Haaland. He questioned her credibility as he charged, "if she will lie to...she will do whatever the hell she has to for power."

Reactions spark further investigation

Turner's accusations extend beyond the immediate concerns of unauthorized signatures. He has criticized the administration's broader political maneuvers, suggesting that even Biden would be unlikely to support such controversial energy policies, considering electoral stakes in states like Pennsylvania.

In reaction to these events, an unnamed Cabinet member reportedly told Tapper and Thompson that the administration may have deliberately restricted Biden's interactions. This revelation further entrenches the claims of concealment.

The echo of these accusations has prompted political observers to reassess the inner workings of the current government.

If substantiated, the implications could be profound for Biden's administration and its approach to governance.

Calls emerge for transparency, action

The implications of Turner's investigation have sparked discussions about the legal ramifications. He has characterized the alleged actions as not merely criminal, but "evil," illustrating the depth of his condemnation.

While there is acknowledgment of some degree of presidential immunity, Turner emphasized the gravity of the actions, calling for accountability across the board. "This is criminal, right?" he remarked, drawing attention to the broader ethical concerns.

This unfolding scandal suggests the need for a comprehensive review of the processes surrounding executive actions within the White House. As the allegations unfold, calls for clarity and responsibility remain at the forefront of political discourse.