Nathan Wade, a former special prosecutor, is set to appear before Congress in a closed-door deposition next week as part of a high-profile investigation.

Wade's deposition is part of an ongoing probe into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s prosecution of former President Donald Trump and involves allegations of romantic involvement and potential financial impropriety, as the Washington Examiner reports.

The ex-prosecutor is due to testify before the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republicans, in what is expected to be a significant closed-door interview. This session is slated for Tuesday morning, according to a subpoena obtained by the Washington Examiner.

Fulton County Investigation into Trump

The deposition forms a part of a yearlong investigation centered on Willis’s handling of the Trump prosecution. Wade initially avoided service of the first subpoena served by the committee, delaying its delivery and declining to accept it electronically. This led Committee Chairman Jim Jordan to take further steps, involving the U.S. Marshals Service to facilitate the subpoena's delivery.

It wasn't until the morning of the initially scheduled deposition that Wade finally acknowledged the first subpoena. As a result of his nonappearance, he was marked as a no-show.

Receiving a second subpoena soon after, Wade now plans to be present alongside his lawyer, Andrew Evans, and he reportedly intends to cooperate with the committee.

Allegations Concerning Wade and Willis

Wade’s scheduled deposition arises amid allegations concerning his romantic relationship with Willis, which surfaced during the Georgia pretrial proceedings concerning the Trump case. The discovery of this relationship has been used by Trump’s legal team to argue for a dismissal of the case against him.

The scope of Wade's deposition will be narrowly defined, focusing on certain confidential aspects of Trump’s ongoing prosecution. Meanwhile, Wade's resignation coincided with the romantic involvement allegations becoming public.

Evans commented on their approach to the inquiry, stating a willingness to cooperate fully, though they remain uncertain on the new issues that may be explored by lawmakers.

Concerns Over Funding and Financial Implications

The Judiciary Committee's investigation includes a scrutiny of key financial questions, as it was disclosed that Wade billed nearly $700,000 to Fulton County while working with the district attorney. This has raised questions concerning the use of federal grant monies during this period.

Willis’s office reportedly received $14.6 million in grants from the Department of Justice between 2020 and 2023. Jim Jordan expressed concerns over whether taxpayer funds were used to support what he described as "politically motivated prosecution."

Willis has publicly denied receiving any financial benefits from her personal relationship with Wade. She clarified that they shared expenses during their time together.

Statements from Willis on Grant Compliance

In response to funding allegations, Willis defended her office's grant programs, stressing their effectiveness and compliance with federal requirements. She issued a statement earlier this year asserting cooperation with the Department of Justice regarding these programs.

The scrutiny extends to potential disqualification from handling the Trump case, given her relationship with Wade. This issue is currently under consideration by the Georgia Court of Appeals, which is expected to deliver a ruling within the year.

Wade’s involvement with Willis and the Trump prosecution continues to generate significant interest, drawing attention from both the press and legal observers.

A Look Ahead to Upcoming Testimony

The impending testimony promises to shed more light on the allegations and the appropriateness of the financial expenditures in question. Observers are eager to learn how Wade's testimony might influence the broader investigation led by the House Judiciary Committee.

As Wade prepares for his closed-door session, questions linger about the potential revelations from his deposition. The outcome of these proceedings could impact not only the parties involved but also the investigation's trajectory concerning Trump's prosecution.

In conclusion, the attention set upon Nathan Wade's deposition illustrates a pivotal moment in the continuing investigation. The combination of personal allegations and financial scrutiny ensures that this story remains a focal point in both legal and political circles.