In a revelation that has surprised many, Hunter Biden is reportedly functioning as the unofficial "acting chief of staff" at the White House, closely involved in presidential advisory roles.

This comes despite the first son's recent criminal conviction and a looming federal trial, sparking debates about the propriety of his White House involvement and his potential implications, as Breitbart reports.

Hunter's New Influence

Hunter Biden, whose legal challenges have been widely publicized, has been frequently spotted at the White House since President Joe Biden’s problematic debate performance.

He has been observed participating actively in meetings, a role typically reserved for staff with official titles and security clearances.

According to sources, Hunter’s involvement in these White House meetings since early July has been noted as unusual by both insiders and observers. Four informed sources conveyed to NBC News on July 2 that his participation was not in line with normal White House protocol.

Concerns Emerge Over Hunter Biden's White House Interactions

This unexpected role has reportedly triggered varied reactions among senior White House staff, with some expressing surprise and concern over his frequent involvement. The presence of a convicted felon in such high-level meetings raises questions about security protocols and vetting processes that might normally apply to such a role.

Karine Jean-Pierre, White House press secretary, commented on Hunter's unusual presence during the July Fourth weekend at the White House. However, she stopped short of confirming his engagement with senior advisers or discussing the scope of his involvement.

Historically, Hunter Biden has been implicated in controversies regarding access to the White House during Joe Biden’s vice presidency, as reported by Joel Pollak from Breitbart News. His recent frequent presence has reignited concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the appropriateness of his access to sensitive meetings.

Legal Challenges Cloud Hunter Biden's White House Role

In June, a Delaware jury found Hunter Biden guilty on three counts related to gun charges, escalating the scrutiny around his involvement in White House affairs. Furthermore, he is slated to stand trial in September for alleged tax violations, complicating the political landscape for President Biden.

The uncertainty surrounding whether Hunter has undergone the necessary security and background checks for his reported role adds another layer of complexity. This lack of clarity further fuels the debate over his qualifications and the potential risks his involvement may pose to White House operations and security.

Despite these legal and procedural red flags, comments from associates suggest that President Biden’s decision to involve Hunter may be driven more by family loyalty than political expedience. A former colleague of President Biden indicated that this situation is more about familial bonds than political strategies.

Family Loyalty at the Heart of Controversy

"Hunter is the X factor here, wanting to encourage his father like deceased brother Beau did, and not wanting the stress of his felony convictions to hamper his father," one insider noted, highlighting the personal dimensions influencing Hunter’s White Branch stints.

The involvement of Hunter has been framed by some as a means to provide emotional support to President Biden, reminiscent of the role previously filled by his late son Beau. "Having Hunter on the scene is not helping Biden politically, but that’s not what this is about," remarked a Democrat who worked with Biden earlier.

This sentiment was echoed in concerns voiced by White House insiders, summarized succinctly as "What the hell is happening?" These reactions underscore the internal uncertainty and apprehension about the influence Hunter Biden wields within the current administration.

Biden Family Dynamics Amid Political Turbulence

As debates continue over Hunter Biden’s role and the potential implications for the Biden administration, the situation remains dynamic and fraught with political and personal complexities. His high visibility and involvement at the White House, particularly at a time of significant personal and legal challenges, remain a critical focal point for both supporters and critics of the administration.

Ultimately, the interruption of family loyalty, political necessity, and legal entanglements in Hunter Biden's White House role paints a convoluted picture of governance that controversially blurs the lines between personal allegiance and public accountability.

In conclusion, Hunter Biden's reported involvement as an informal "acting chief of staff" and his presence at high-level meetings despite ongoing legal battles have sparked significant discourse about security, propriety, and the profound influence of familial relationships in political spheres.

As this situation unfolds, it will undoubtedly continue to attract scrutiny and spark debate about the boundaries of family involvement in governance.