DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Republican Lawmakers Respond After 9/11 Terrorist Plea Deals Canceled

 August 5, 2024

In a noteworthy move, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has annulled plea deals for three terrorists involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

This Biden administration decision, which came after substantial backlash over the agreements, drew reactions from various U.S. senators who emphasized the importance of holding the terrorists accountable, as the Daily Wire reports.

The now-canceled plea agreements, which had previously been publicized, would have spared Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi from the death penalty in exchange for their guilty pleas. Instead of facing the death penalty, the terms of the plea agreements would have led to life sentences for the three individuals.

Reaction From Key Senate Leaders

Retired Brig. Gen. Susan K. Escallier, who extended the original plea deal, has been removed from her oversight of the case. The cancellation of these deals has prompted various U.S. senators to release statements over the weekend, supporting Secretary Austin's decision.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. Tom Cotton voiced their agreement, stating, "We are glad that Secretary Austin came to his senses, heeded our warning, and decided to take the concerns of 9/11 victims and families seriously."

McConnell and Cotton criticized the initial consideration of the plea deals by the Biden-Harris Administration, describing it as disgraceful. "America deserves a Commander-in-Chief committed to peace through strength, not chaos through weakness," they added.

House Speaker's Perspective

They also indicated their readiness to counter any future plea deals by introducing the Justice for 9/11 Act. "The President must know that we continue to watch this situation closely,” they stated. “The U.S. must never flinch in holding terrorists accountable for their actions,” they concluded.

House Speaker Mike Johnson also weighed in, applauding the reversal. "The administration was correct to reverse course after receiving letters from @GOPoversight and @HASCRepublicans launching investigations into this terrible plea deal. Now deliver long-awaited justice for 9/11 families," Johnson stated. His comments align with the overall sentiment of ensuring justice for the families affected by the Sept. 11 attacks.

Insights From Lindsey Graham

Sen. Lindsey Graham also praised the decision. "I firmly believe that Secretary Austin did the right thing and exercised good command judgement by revoking the plea deal for the 9/11 mastermind and his accomplices," he remarked.

Graham emphasized the broader implications of the decision, suggesting that the initial plea deal would have sent entirely the wrong message to terrorists worldwide.

"I know the families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks will appreciate this -- as do I," Graham added.

Context of the Initial Plea Deals

The initial plea arrangements planned for the terrorists, had they not been revoked, would have potentially set a precedent. Instead, the cancellation aims to underline a strong stance against terrorism, reflecting the sentiments of many lawmakers and affected families.

The move by Secretary Austin comes amid a broader national conversation about justice and how best to address acts of terrorism through legal means.

It also raises questions about the balance between securing convictions and imposing the maximum penalties permissible under law.

Public and Political Response

The outpouring of statements from key political figures underscores the weight of the decision within the context of national security and justice for the 9/11 victims and their families.

Austin's decision reflects a commitment to reevaluate and respond to public and legislative concerns, particularly those of the victims' families who have long awaited justice.

Moving forward, the focus remains on how the administration will navigate these complex legal terrains while maintaining a stance perceived as strong and just.

Conclusion

The decision by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin to cancel the plea deals for three terrorists involved in the Sept. 11 attacks has sparked significant political reactions.

Key lawmakers have expressed support, emphasizing the need for accountability, justice for the victims' families, and a firm stance against terrorism.

The initial consideration of the deals stirred controversy, but the reversal aims to address the concerns of 9/11 families and hold the terrorists fully accountable.