DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Republican States Challenge Biden's Obamacare Extension to Undocumented Immigrants

 August 11, 2024

A legal challenge spearheaded by a red state against the Biden administration's new healthcare rule marks a significant clash over immigration and healthcare policies.

In a move led by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, a group of GOP-helmed states is suing to prevent certain undocumented immigrants from accessing Obamacare benefits, as Fox News reports.

The controversy stems from a recent decision by the Biden administration to extend healthcare benefits to undocumented immigrants, specifically those under the DACA program. Published in May, the new rule is set to make these individuals eligible for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly known as Obamacare.

This directive, which contradicts current law that bars illegal immigrants from ACA benefits, is slated to go into effect in November. It could potentially cover over 100,000 undocumented immigrants currently without insurance.

Expanding Healthcare to DACA Recipients

Fifteen states, including Alabama, Idaho, and Virginia, have joined Kansas in this lawsuit. They argue that the new rule unlawfully extends federal benefits to a group not legally eligible under the existing terms of the ACA.

The states assert that the ACA specifically limits its reach to U.S. citizens, nationals, and those lawfully present in the country.

By redefining what it means to be “lawfully present,” the Biden administration's rule allows DACA recipients to enroll in programs through HealthCare.gov and state-based marketplaces.

This legal action underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the DACA program, which protects young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children from deportation. Although DACA grants them certain rights, it does not provide a permanent legal status or a clear path to citizenship.

The Political and Legal Implications

Kobach, leading the multi-state lawsuit, criticized the administration's move as a violation of federal law. "Illegal aliens shouldn't get a free pass into our country. They shouldn't receive taxpayer benefits when they arrive, and the Biden-Harris administration shouldn't get a free pass to violate federal law," he stated emphatically.

In contrast, President Biden has been vocal about his support for DACA recipients, commonly known as Dreamers. "I’m proud of the contributions of Dreamers to our country and committed to providing them the support they need to succeed," Biden explained.

The president also highlighted his efforts to fortify DACA and his continued advocacy for comprehensive immigration reform that would include a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants.

Response from Biden Administration

Vice President Kamala Harris echoed Biden’s sentiments, emphasizing the temporary nature of DACA and the administration's commitment to safeguard it.

"President Biden and I will continue to do everything in our power to protect DACA, but it is only a temporary solution. Congress must act to ensure Dreamers have the permanent protections they deserve," she remarked.

Meanwhile, the Department of Health and Human Services, responsible for the implementation of the ACA, has not issued a comment regarding the lawsuit.

The case, which involves a broad coalition of states with significant political and demographic diversity, is likely to become a pivotal battleground over the intersection of immigration policy and healthcare access in the United States.

Broader Impact on Healthcare and Immigration

The outcome of this legal challenge could have far-reaching implications for the Biden administration's approach to healthcare reform and immigration policy. It also poses significant questions about the limits of executive power in redefining eligibility for federal programs.

As the November implementation date approaches, both supporters and opponents of the rule will closely monitor the progression of the lawsuit, making it a key issue in the broader national debate over immigration and healthcare rights.

In conclusion, this lawsuit not only challenges the extension of healthcare benefits to undocumented immigrants under the DACA program but also tests the boundaries of legislative and executive powers in U.S. governance. As the case unfolds, it will undoubtedly influence future policies and the lives of thousands of undocumented residents seeking healthcare access.