DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

RFK Jr. Declines To Support Harris, Highlights Divergent Political Views

 August 16, 2024

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent candidate for president, has declared he will not endorse Vice President Kamala Harris for the upcoming presidential election. This decision marks a significant stance by Kennedy against a party he once belonged to.

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emphasizes a profound divergence in political philosophy with Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party, Breitbart reported.

Kennedy's declaration came on Thursday, following his attempts to discuss a potential endorsement in exchange for a cabinet position, a move initially reported by The Washington Post.

Kennedy’s Efforts to Engage with Harris

Despite his aspirations for a meeting, according to a report by the New York Times on Wednesday night, Kennedy stated that his attempts to communicate through high-level intermediaries were unsuccessful. He revealed, "We've reached out repeatedly through the highest-level intermediaries. We’ve been told that they have no interest in talking with me."

His public frustration was evident when he aired his grievances on the X platform.

Critique of Democratic Policies and Direction

On X, Kennedy expressed that under Harris’s leadership, the Democratic Party had deviated significantly from the ideologies of his father, Robert Kennedy, and uncle, John F. Kennedy. He described a transformation of the Democratic Party into what he deemed as unrecognizable from the time of his influential relatives.

“The Democratic Party of RFK and JFK was the party of civil liberties and free speech. VP Harris’s is the party of censorship, lockdowns, and medical coercion,” he posted.

Contrasting War Stances and Socio-Economic Alliances

Kennedy also criticized the current Democratic Party’s stance on war and socio-economic issues. He argued that the party had shifted from being anti-war to one filled with "neocon warmongers." Moreover, he suggested that the party was now more aligned with major corporations rather than the working-class base it traditionally supported.

“The RFK/JFK dems were allies of Main Street, cops, firefighters, and working people. VP Harris’s is the Party of Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Wall Street,” Kennedy claimed in his critique.

Debate Skills and Electoral Integrity Concerns

Furthermore, Kennedy lamented the decline in debate quality and electoral integrity within the party. He highlighted, “My dad and uncle’s party was the champion of voting rights and fair elections. VP Harris’s is the party of lawfare, disenfranchisement, and the coronation of its candidates by corporate donors and party elites.”

He continued criticizing Harris’s campaign methods, pointing out her reliance on what he described as immature tactics rather than substantive political discourse.

Final Stance Against Harris’s Candidacy

Despite the political landscape and his previous party affiliation, Kennedy's resolve remains firm. “I do not have plans to endorse her, I do have a plan to defeat her,” he emphasized, indicating his commitment to oppose Harris in the presidential race.

This development signifies a deep rift within the broader political framework that once united figures like Kennedy to the Democratic establishment.

In recounting Kennedy's position, it is clear that his views contrast sharply with Harris on various fronts—from civil liberties and war policies to economic alliances and electoral practices. Kennedy attributes these differences to his decision not to endorse Harris, signifying a significant political and ideological division. This culmination of events highlights the broader discourse surrounding the current political climate and the shifting ideological boundaries within American politics.

Kennedy’s assertive distancing from Harris and the Democratic Party he once knew marks a pivotal moment in his political career. His candid criticisms and refusal to endorse the Vice President underscore a critical discourse on the direction of major political parties in the United States.

By aligning his political identity with the revered legacies of his father and uncle, Kennedy positions himself not just against Harris, but against what he perceives as the Democratic Party’s departure from its foundational values of liberty, debate, and public service.

As the presidential race continues, the impact of Kennedy's rejection and his proposed alternative policies will likely resonate among voters who are nostalgic for the Democratic Party’s past or dissatisfied with its current trajectory.