Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has issued a stern warning, urging careful monitoring of Elon Musk's activities within the Trump administration.

Expressing what is a bipartisan concern shared by conservative voices such as those of Steve Bannon and Laura Loomer, Raskin has raised questions regarding Musk's influence over U.S. infrastructures without having an elected position, as The Hill reports.

During an interview on MSNBC, echoed the apprehensions of Bannon and Loomer. The surprising alignment in viewpoints among political opposites highlights the unease surrounding Musk's direct and indirect roles.

Bannon and Loomer have criticized Musk previously for his endorsement of non-immigrant H-1B visas. According to them, Musk's stance poses a potential threat to American workers' interests.

A Closer Look at Loomer's Allegations

Loomer has further claimed that parts of her accounts on Musk’s platform, X, have been demonetized and unverified. The actions, according to her, were taken without proper communication or clarified rationale.

Musk's reach in the system has extended beyond the tech sector -- he, reportedly, has access to substantial data from the Treasury Department and USAID. Critics argue that this access grants him an undue level of influence over policymaking.

Sympathetic to proposals to potentially eliminate the Education Department, Musk, according to reports, controls significant components of the country's infrastructures. Raskin, for his part, called out these developments as alarming.

Critiques of Musk's Influence in Various Spheres

Raskin's comments notably spotlighted the breadth of Musk's influence.

“Elon Musk has essentially attempted to seize control of the country’s communications infrastructure, the governmental financial payments infrastructure, the data infrastructure, and he’s got important parts of nodes of the military infrastructure," stated Raskin.

Interestingly, Democrats have been opposing the actions of Trump's administration concurrently in the courts.

As the courts see the initiation of lawsuits, other public figures such as former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, have underscored a belief in the need for immediate and more comprehensive actions to address threats to national stability.

Trump Weighs in

Nevertheless, these allegations found little footing with President Trump, who dismissed claims of Musk’s expanded control. He ardently advocated that Musk has only acted with the administration's full approval.

“He's been granted access only to dismiss individuals deemed unsuitable -- and that too, strictly upon our agreement with him,” affirmed Trump.

The administration stands firm on its stance that Musk "will not attempt or accomplish anything without our explicit approval," irrespective of the bipartisan apprehension.

Decoding the Intricate Dynamics of Influence and Power

“I align with Steve Bannon, Laura Loomer, and people on the right who advise caution towards Elon Musk because he’s centralizing all power. Surprisingly, he hasn’t been elected to any office," Raskin declared, elucidating the rare bipartisan consensus on the matter.

Raskin summed up his broader take, saying, “In fact, I see through Donald Trump, whose intention to misuse civil rights, liberties, and centralize power within himself is quite apparent."

These comments underscored the persistent concerns some have about the position and influence of unelected individuals in the current administration.

As the dynamics between power and influence continue to unfold, there's no doubt that all eyes are on Elon Musk.