Secret Service Opposed Use of Metal Detectors at Prior Trump Events, Report Claims
An assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump has sparked intense scrutiny of the Secret Service and its security measures.
Initially, concerns were raised when a Trump campaign official lamented the frequent absence of metal detectors at Trump's events, a security measure they deemed necessary for events as recent as Barron Trump's high school graduation ceremony this spring, as Business Insider reports.
Security Measures for Graduation Under Microscope
One particular point of contention was the Secret Service's handling of a security request for Barron Trump’s high school graduation.
Despite the presence of Donald Trump, the Secret Service initially denied the need for metal detectors, classifying the event as non-political. However, the agency later acquiesced and installed the detectors.
This change in decision underscores the tension between required security measures and their implementation at events not directly related to politics.
Further complicating the Secret Service's month was an incident at a New York City rally for Trump. The absence of metal detectors led to a significant backlog of attendees, illustrating potential vulnerabilities in crowd management and security protocols.
Secret Service Admission and Congressional Response
Following these events, the Secret Service retracted an earlier statement, acknowledging that it had indeed denied some of Trump's team's requests for additional security resources, though the agency specified this did not pertain to the Butler rally. This admission came amidst increasing scrutiny over how security decisions are made for high-profile protectees.
Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi has been at the forefront of the controversy, addressing these issues publicly. He stated, "There's an untrue assertion that a member of the former president's team requested additional resources and that those were rebuffed."
However, he later corrected this by acknowledging modifications to security setups when specialized units were unavailable.
Guglielmi explained, "This may include utilizing state or local partners to provide specialized functions or otherwise identifying alternatives to reduce public exposure of a protectee."
Assassination Attempt Details and Reactions
The Butler assassination attempt was initiated by Thomas Matthew Crooks, who fired at Trump a building in close proximity to the dais, striking him in the right ear.
The violent act resulted in a fatality and two critical injuries, prompting former Secret Service agent Tim McCarthy to label the incident a "failure" of the security operation.
"It's a failure. Plain and simple. Any time a protectee is harmed, there's something that has to change," McCarthy stated, encapsulating the gravity of the breach in security.
In response to this catastrophic failure, House Speaker Mike Johnson has announced a congressional investigation aimed at uncovering the deficiencies that allowed such an event to occur.
Looking Forward: Secret Service Under Examination
Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle is scheduled to testify before Congress on Monday, when she will likely face tough questions about the agency’s operational protocols and decision-making processes.
This testimony is part of a broader effort to comprehensively address and rectify such lapses.
The Secret Service has committed itself to thoroughly analyzing and learning from the missteps surrounding the assassination attempt. Guglielmi, on X (formerly Twitter), affirmed the agency’s dedication to improvement following these revelations.
How the larger story will unfold and what reforms may result from the probe are things that remain to be seen.