Senate Democrats to attempt defunding DHS after Minneapolis shooting

 January 25, 2026

Washington is on edge as a tragic shooting in Minneapolis threatens to derail critical government funding just days before a looming deadline.

On Saturday, a 37-year-old Minneapolis man, Alex Pretti, was fatally shot by a border patrol agent during an immigration enforcement operation. Senate Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), have announced plans to vote against a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding measure tied to a broader six-bill spending package. With a Jan. 30 deadline approaching, their opposition risks a partial government shutdown, while an arctic storm has already delayed Senate votes scheduled for Monday.

The fallout from this incident has intensified existing concerns among Democrats about DHS operations, especially in states like Minnesota. The refusal to support the funding bill, which includes restrictions and reporting requirements for DHS, could disrupt a fragile bipartisan agreement. Removing the DHS measure from the package would also create procedural hurdles, as changes must return to the House, which is on recess until Feb. 2.

Minneapolis Shooting Sparks Funding Fight

According to Fox News, the issue has sparked fierce debate over federal agency accountability and border enforcement policies. While the tragedy of Alex Pretti’s death demands answers, the timing of this political standoff couldn’t be worse with a shutdown looming.

Schumer didn’t mince words on Saturday, declaring, "I will vote no." He’s doubling down, insisting that Senate Democrats won’t budge if the DHS funding remains in the package. But is this the moment to play hardball when essential services hang in the balance?

Let’s be clear: DHS isn’t getting a blank check in this proposal—there are triggers to halt cash flows if certain conditions aren’t met. Throwing out the entire bill over ideological gripes risks punishing hardworking border agents and even active-duty troops who could face delayed payments in a shutdown. It’s a reckless gamble with real consequences.

Democrats Draw Line on DHS Oversight

Schumer’s frustration centers on what he sees as insufficient curbs on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) practices. He claimed on Saturday that Democrats pushed for "commonsense reforms" but were stonewalled. Yet, with bipartisan talks already yielding compromises, this sudden pivot feels more like posturing than principle.

Several Senate Democrats, including Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), were already skeptical before the shooting. Their stance hardens the party line, but at what cost? A partial shutdown won’t fix enforcement issues—it’ll just create more chaos.

The House, having passed all 12 appropriations bills, isn’t even in session to address last-minute changes. A House GOP leadership source bluntly stated, "We have no plan to come back next week." With lawmakers scattered and a snowstorm snarling travel, any emergency return could still miss the Jan. 30 deadline.

Shutdown Risks Loom Over Agencies

Time is not on anyone’s side here. If the Senate can’t resolve this by Friday, agencies like DHS could grind to a halt, impacting air traffic controllers and border security personnel. That’s not a theoretical problem—it’s a paycheck delay for folks who keep us safe.

Even if House leaders tried to rally lawmakers back, attendance issues loom large with some campaigning and others on planned trips. Pushing a vote to Wednesday or Thursday likely means missing the cutoff. This isn’t just a political game; it’s a logistical mess.

Look, no one disputes the need for oversight after a tragedy like the Minneapolis shooting. But using a funding bill as a battering ram to score points against federal agencies ignores the broader stakes. Senate Democrats risk alienating the very workers they claim to protect by stalling this deal.

Balancing Reform with Responsibility

A senior Senate aide told Fox News Digital that Democrats had been part of crafting these bills and initially supported the process. So why the about-face now? It smells like political theater when compromise was already on the table.

The broader package funds critical departments like Health and Human Services, Labor, and Transportation alongside DHS. Torpedoing it over one bill doesn’t just hurt enforcement agencies—it ripples across government functions. That’s not reform; it’s sabotage of the system taxpayers rely on.

In the end, both sides need to step back from the brink. Tragedies like Alex Pretti’s death deserve serious investigation, not knee-jerk obstruction that punishes unrelated agencies and workers. With Jan. 30 closing in, it’s time to prioritize stability over showdowns.

DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News