In a fiery call to action, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has urged a sweeping federal response from the Trump administration to what he describes as organized political violence, citing the recent death of conservative leader Charlie Kirk as a catalyst, as Newsmax reports.

Miller's remarks, delivered during a broadcast of The Charlie Kirk Show, have ignited a national conversation about the balance between curbing violence and protecting civil liberties.

The top White House official made his statements on Monday while speaking with Vice President JD Vance on the show, emphasizing the need for immediate and robust government intervention.

Miller takes bold stance

He pointed to the tragic killing of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative figure, as the driving force behind his urgent message.

According to Miller, Kirk's final communication to him stressed the importance of confronting groups that incite unrest, a message he paraphrased as a call to tackle entities that "foment violence."

Miller vowed that any federal action taken would honor Kirk's legacy, stating it would be done "in Charlie's name."

Federal plans set to emerge

Miller outlined a strategy involving the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security to "identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy" what he sees as dangerous networks.

He described these groups as engaging in coordinated efforts of harassment, including online attacks, personal information leaks, and public protests.

Labeling such activities as part of a "vast domestic terror movement," Miller suggested the existence of interconnected "cells," though he offered no specific evidence or named any particular organizations.

Trump ready to take action

President Donald Trump echoed Miller's concerns, expressing his intent to designate the far-left group Antifa as a terrorist organization, stating, "It's something I would do."

Trump also mentioned the potential use of RICO laws, typically applied to organized crime, to address violent protest actions, adding, "I would do that 100 percent."

However, Miller stopped short of detailing specific legal tools, policies, or investigative methods that might be used in this proposed crackdown.

Civil liberties concerns arise

As of now, no federal officials have confirmed new directives or active investigations stemming from Miller's statements, leaving uncertainty about whether these comments signal policy shifts or serve as political rhetoric.

Critics have raised alarms over the broad language used by Miller, warning that it could potentially target lawful protest movements or civic groups under the guise of combating terrorism.

Civil liberties advocates cautioned that branding activist efforts as terror-related without solid proof might lead to legal challenges on constitutional grounds.