Steve Bannon has made serious allegations against the Biden-Harris administration, stating that he is being unlawfully held in prison despite qualifying for early release.

The former White House advisor is serving a four-month sentence for contempt of Congress but claims he should have been released under the First Step Act, as the Post Millennial reports, and says he has remained in custody due to Biden-Harris administration wishes.

Steve Bannon's Current Legal Struggles

Bannon is currently serving his sentence at a federal prison in Connecticut. His conviction stems from his refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by a congressional committee. With his sentence nearing its end, questions about his release have come to the forefront.

Under the 2018 First Step Act, which aims to shorten sentences for non-violent offenders and encourage rehabilitation, Bannon became eligible for early release as of September. However, his current release date is set for Oct. 29, beyond what he considers to be his legal right to early release.

Bannon's Claims Against Administration

Efforts to secure his release under these provisions began with a motion filed on Aug. 29. That motion requests a reimposition of bail or supervised release as a potential alternative to incarceration. Yet, the response from the government has been pending for more than 75 days, leaving Bannon's future uncertain and his criticisms mounting.

The delay has fueled Bannon's allegations that the administration, particularly Vice President Kamala Harris, is neglecting the First Step Act in his case.

Criticism of Harris's Role

Bannon has specifically targeted Harris for criticism, accusing her of championing mass incarceration over reform.

He argues that Harris's actions -- or lack of action -- are adding to her electoral vulnerabilities, particularly concerning support from Black and Hispanic men. His statements include a pointed critique, suggesting that Harris's political prospects are at risk in key urban centers.

Political Implications of Bannon's Accusations

While Bannon has been vociferous in his criticism, the broader implications of his claims highlight potential tensions within the criminal justice system's administration. His assertion that Harris has prioritized detainment over initiatives like the First Step Act presents an avenue for potential policy critique.

This controversy adds to the ongoing debate over the application of criminal justice reforms and their intersection with political agendas.

Awaiting a Government Response

Bannon has also alleged that the Harris Bureau of Prisons is intentionally withholding his release as a means to suppress one of President Donald Trump's most significant and influential supporters.

This accusation frames the legal delay as a politically motivated decision rather than a bureaucratic oversight.

Despite these claims, others point out the actual policy implementation process often entails complexities that complicate swift or straightforward resolutions.

The Road to Resolution

As Bannon's legal team continues to push for a prompt response, they face the challenge of navigating a highly politicized landscape.

The upcoming release date on Oct. 29 signals a critical juncture in Bannon's ongoing legal battle against perceived administrative inertia.

As of now, all eyes are on how the Biden-Harris administration will respond to both the legal and public pressures surrounding this case.

Conclusion: Allegations, Accusations, and Awaiting Outcomes

In summary, Steve Bannon alleges illegal detention against the Biden-Harris administration as he awaits his release from a four-month prison sentence for contempt of Congress.

Bannon qualified for early release under the First Step Act, but a delayed government response has kept him imprisoned past his anticipated release window.

His claims focus on Vice President Kamala Harris's administration, accusing them of prioritizing immigration over citizens and predicting electoral losses due to indifference to community needs.

With the government’s pending response, the situation continues to be a focal point of legal and political examination.