We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

TX Court Clears Man After 20 Years on Death Row for 1977 Killing

 June 24, 2024

In a landmark decision this week, Kerry Max Cook was exonerated by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for the 1977 murder of Linda Jo Edwards, after spending nearly 20 years on death row.

The recent court ruling in Cook's favor highlights severe misconduct by the state, overturning a nearly five-decade-old wrongful conviction, as CNN reports.

Kerry Max Cook's Long Journey to Freedom

Cook was arrested and charged with the murder of Edwards in 1977. Edwards was found murdered in Tyler, Texas, where both she and Cook lived in the same apartment complex. Cook's conviction was primarily based on fingerprints found on a sliding patio door at the crime scene.

However, subsequent scientific analysis would later challenge the assertion that these fingerprints were placed there around the time of the murder. This key piece of evidence had initially linked Cook to the crime scene.

Cook's legal battles included three trials and multiple appeals, stretching over two decades. His first death sentence was handed down in 1979 but was overturned on appeal. A mistrial in 1992 due to a hung jury and a 1994 trial resulted in another death sentence, which was reversed in 1996 due to proven official misconduct.

The Path to Exoneration

In 1999, DNA testing on evidence purportedly from the crime scene did not match Cook, casting further doubt on his guilt. This evidence, specifically DNA from Edwards' underwear, was crucial in challenging the prosecution's case against him.

The first trial's star witness, Edward Scott Jackson, eventually confessed to lying about Cook's supposed confession, stating he did so to receive a lighter sentence for himself. His admission was a pivotal moment in undermining the credibility of the case against Cook.

In anticipation of a fourth trial in 1999, Cook entered a no-contest plea to the murder charge under Alford plea conditions, which allowed him to maintain his innocence while acknowledging the possibility of conviction. He was sentenced to 20 years but was credited for time served and released, though his conviction remained on record until now.

Historical Misconduct and Judicial Findings

The court's decision, written by Judge Bert Richardson, was scathing in its critique of the state's handling of Cook's case. Richardson noted, "This case is riddled with allegations of State misconduct that warrant setting aside Applicant’s conviction."

Richardson further emphasized the presence of "uncontroverted Brady violations, proof of false testimony, admissions of perjury, and new scientific evidence" in clearing Cook's name. These findings highlight the systemic failures that contributed to Cook's wrongful conviction and subsequent decades on death row.

Glenn Garber, Cook's attorney, expressed relief and vindication at the decision, stating, “The decision finally and forcefully clears his name, and at the same time chronicles the State’s outrageous and unrelenting misconduct."

Legacy of a Legal Battle

Now 68 years old, Cook has maintained his innocence throughout his nearly 50-year ordeal. His case has been a significant part of discussions around the death penalty and wrongful convictions in the United States.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, Cook is one of at least 199 people exonerated from death row since 1973. This statistic underscores the potential for grave errors within the judicial system, particularly in capital cases.

The current Smith County District Attorney, Jacob Putman, who took office in 2019, was noted in the appeals court's decision as not being responsible for the past misconduct in Cook's case. This acknowledgment indicates a shift towards accountability and correction of past judicial errors within the county.

Reflections on Justice and Injustice

As Glenn Garber poignantly remarked, “Kerry suffered immensely for nearly 50 years, and nothing can give him his life back.” This statement encapsulates the irreversible damage caused by the miscarriage of justice Cook endured.

The implications of this exoneration extend beyond Cook's personal vindication, highlighting systemic issues that can lead to wrongful convictions and the importance of diligence in ensuring the integrity of judicial proceedings.

Garber's comments also serve as a reminder of the human cost of legal oversights and the enduring impact of state actions on individuals' lives.

Conclusion: A Case Closed, Questions Remain

In conclusion, the case of Kerry Max Cook is a stark reminder of the fallibility of the justice system and the need for continual reassessment and reform.

From the initial misidentification based on flawed forensic evidence to the eventual acknowledgment of prosecutorial misconduct, Cook's exoneration sheds light on critical issues facing our legal systems today.

It serves as a crucial lesson in the power and responsibility of the justice system to right its wrongs and uphold the principles of fairness and truth.