During President Donald Trump's recent visit to the Lone Star State amid a catastrophic flooding disaster, a local resident was taken into custody for making death threats against him on social media.

A Texas man claimed he would not miss if given the chance to shoot Trump during his visit to flood-stricken areas, as The Blaze reports, with the threat resulting in his arrest.

Trump arrived in Texas to extend support to the victims suffering from the devastating floods, which have unfortunately claimed 121 lives and left 160 missing. His visit was meant to showcase federal solidarity with the affected communities.

Details on social media threat emerge

Amid the president's visit, Robert Herrera, 52, from San Antonio, posted threatening messages on Facebook publicly. His disturbing post was in response to a news article detailing Trump’s activities in Texas.

Herrera’s threat implied a violent intention with the statement, "I won't miss," referencing a failed assassination attempt against Trump that occurred in Butler, Pennsylvania, in 2024.

Shortly after, threats escalated with another comment targeting a fellow user, accompanied by an image of ammunition and an assault rifle.

This alarming online behavior quickly drew the attention of the authorities, who moved swiftly to address the potential threat.

Collaborative effort leads to quick arrest

The severity of the threats led to collaboration between the San Antonio Police Department, the FBI, and the U.S. Secret Service. This led to Herrera’s arrest on a Thursday evening, ensuring any potential harm he could inflict was curtailed promptly.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas promptly charged Herrera.

He faces allegations of making threats against the president and transmitting interstate threatening communications.

If convicted, Herrera could face a stringent penalty. Each charge could lead to up to five years in prison, underscoring the seriousness with which such threats are treated.

Community reactions pour in

The community's reaction to Trump’s visit and Herrera’s threats has been mixed. Some residents have speculated about the federal response to the floods, pointing to budget cuts during Trump's administration as exacerbating the disaster's impact. These accusations have been robustly denied by officials from Trump’s office.

This incident raises significant concerns about the security measures during presidential visits, especially in times of crisis when emotions run high and the potential for threats increases.

The incident serves as a stark reminder of the charged political climate and the intense scrutiny under which public figures, especially presidential figures, operate.

Disaster response debate persists

While federal officials argue that adequate measures have been taken to aid flood victims in Texas, some local voices continue to debate the effectiveness of these initiatives. The argument underscores a broader national conversation about the role and responsibility of the federal government during natural disasters.

As communities strive to rebuild, the scrutiny of federal disaster responses and the security of presidential visits remain subjects of national interest.

Herrera's case also serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of threatening public officials, spotlighting the fine line between free expression and criminal threats.

The upcoming trial of Robert Herrera will undoubtedly be closely watched, serving both as a legal proceeding and a public discourse on the boundaries of political dissent in America today.