Trump administration ends Temporary Protected Status for Afghans, Cameroonians
The Trump administration has announced it will not renew the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation for Afghan and Cameroonian nationals protected under this program.
The decision impacts over 14,000 Afghan and 7,000 Cameroonian individuals who now face the possibility of deportation when their protections expire in May and June, respectively, as Fox News reports.
The TPS designation is granted to nationals from countries suffering from severe conditions such as war or natural disaster, allowing them to reside temporarily in the United States.
This status, which is renewed every six to 18 months, was awarded to Afghan nationals following the U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 under the Biden administration.
DHS says Afghanistan no longer meets criteria
Afghans were initially protected to provide relief amid the chaotic transition after the departure of American forces during the Biden administration. However, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has decided against renewing this status, an action that could lead to mass deportations.
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin explained the process: "At least 60 days before a TPS designation expires, the Secretary must review the conditions... to determine whether the conditions supporting the designation continue." After consulting with U.S. agencies, the secretary concluded that Afghanistan no longer meets the requirements for TPS.
The decision was influenced by a review conducted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and consultations with the Department of State.
Despite ongoing challenges, the current administration sees improved conditions on the ground, taking a different view of some refugee advocacy groups.
Advocates oppose decision
Organizations aiding displaced Afghans have voiced strong opposition. Shawn VanDriver, president of #AfghanEvac, criticized the decision, stating, "The conditions on the ground haven't improved — they've worsened." He highlighted the broken promises to Afghans who were invited and have settled in the U.S.
The revocation also extends to Cameroonian nationals, with nearly 7,000 facing potential deportation once their TPS status concludes in June.
The State Department has advised increased caution for travel to Cameroon, citing terrorism and kidnapping threats.
Recent attempts to end protections for other groups, such as Venezuelans, have faced judicial delays. Nonetheless, Afghanistan remains categorized as a "Level 4: Do Not Travel" area due to terrorism and civil unrest, questioning the assessment that it no longer qualifies for TPS.
Full scope of implications unclear
The decision has stirred concerns about the future welfare of those affected, who have established lives in the U.S. since their evacuation. The U.S. military's 2021 evacuation effort brought over 82,000 Afghans stateside, aiming for their safety amid Taliban advances.
Many advocates argue that revoking TPS now undermines previous assistance commitments and complicates integration efforts for those Afghans and Cameroonians who have rebuilt in the U.S. Critics suggest it could damage international perceptions of U.S. humanitarian responsibilities.
McLaughlin clarified that if conditions in a country no longer fulfill statutory requirements, the secretary is bound to terminate the TPS designation. As a result, individuals from affected nations must begin preparations for potential deportation.
Policy shift remains under scrutiny
This policy shift reflects broader themes in the current administration's stance on immigration. The topic remains a point of contention, with divided opinions on the proper balance between national security concerns and humanitarian obligations.
As the expiration dates near, the DHS and related agencies will likely face intense scrutiny from advocates, legal entities, and possibly Congress. Discussions continue over whether alternative immigration statuses or extensions might be possible for those who risk deportation.
Despite differing opinions on the decision, the resolution will undoubtedly impact thousands of lives and continue to spark debate over America's role in global humanitarian crises and immigration policy regarding TPS beneficiaries. The enduring question remains: what is America's commitment to those who seek refuge within its borders?