In a fiery declaration, Alina Habba, a lawyer for Donald Trump, has asserted that writer E. Jean Carroll will end up with "zero" from her $83 million defamation award from her case against the former president, further mocking her as "crazy."

Following a controversial defamation case, Trump's attorney has pledged not only to ensure that Carroll receives nothing from her legal victory but also to counter-sue for Trump's legal expenses, as Mediaite reports.

The defamation case in question resulted in an $83.3 million judgment against Trump, awarded to Carroll.

Habba has been vocal in her criticism of Carroll and the judgment, labeling her as "crazy" and vowing that she would receive nothing from the award.

Trump Posts Bond to Appeal Defamation Judgment

In response to the judgment, Trump has posted a $91.6 million bond to appeal the decision. This move signifies Trump's intent to fight the judgment awarded to Carroll, which stemmed from allegations that he defamed her while he was president.

The legal battle drew attention when Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that Trump had defamed Carroll, with the jury and trial evidence supporting Carroll's claim that Trump had sexually abused her. This ruling forms the basis of the substantial financial award to Carroll.

Legal Strife and Public Comments

Habba's remarks came during her appearance on the PBD Podcast, hosted by Patrick Bet-David, where she discussed various legal challenges facing Trump, including the Carroll case. She emphatically promised that Carroll would receive "zero" from the defamation award and announced intentions to sue for attorney’s fees.

The podcast episode also featured moments where Habba and the co-hosts reviewed video clips of Carroll, critiquing her aspirations to use the awarded funds for women's rights and other charitable causes. They suggested that Carroll's behavior and statements in the clips demonstrated instability, reinforcing their claim that Trump's comments were not defamatory.

Amidst the podcast's discourse, Habba's comments were notably sharp. She remarked, "Zero! Zero. And then I’m going to sue for attorney’s fees," highlighting her determination to challenge Carroll's financial gain from the lawsuit and to burden Carroll with the cost of Trump's legal defense.

Carroll's Intentions and Public Reaction

Carroll, on her part, has expressed her intentions to use the award for altruistic purposes. "I have such great ideas for all the good I’m going to do with this money!" Carroll stated, indicating her plans to support women's rights among other causes.

The public and media reaction to Habba's comments and the ongoing legal saga has been mixed, with many observing the case as a significant moment in the discussion of defamation, legal retaliation, and the consequences of public figures' actions.

As the appeal process unfolds, the legal and public scrutiny of both parties' actions and statements continues to intensify, signaling a protracted battle ahead in both the courtroom and the court of public opinion.

Analysis and Future Implications

The defamation case against Donald Trump by E. Jean Carroll has escalated into a broader conversation about the intersection of legal judgments, public figures' accountability, and the ramifications of defamation claims. This case exemplifies the complex dynamics at play when public allegations lead to significant legal and financial consequences.

Alina Habba's aggressive stance in defending Trump and challenging Carroll's award underlines the heated nature of this legal conflict. With Trump's appeal in motion and Habba's threats to sue for legal fees, the case is set to continue influencing discussions on defamation law and survivors' rights.

The outcome of this appeal and any subsequent legal actions could set precedents for how defamation cases involving high-profile individuals are handled in the future, particularly in situations where allegations of serious misconduct are involved.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

In conclusion, the defamation lawsuit between Donald Trump and E. Jean Carroll has evolved into a contentious battle, with significant legal and public relations implications. Alina

Habba's assertion that Carroll will receive "zero" from her $83 million award and the vow to recoup Trump's legal expenses highlight the aggressive legal strategy being employed. Trump's posting of a $91.6 million bond to appeal the judgment adds another layer to this complex legal dispute. As the case proceeds, it remains a focal point for discussions on defamation, legal accountability, and the role of public figures in society.