We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Trump New York Trial: Karen McDougal Not Slated to Take Stand

 May 10, 2024

In a significant development in the New York criminal trial of President Donald Trump, Playboy model Karen McDougal will not testify following Stormy Daniels' recent court appearance.

Prosecutors have retracted their earlier decision to call Karen McDougal to the witness stand after Daniels provided controversial testimony against Trump, as the Washington Examiner reports.

The trial, centered around accusations that Trump conspired to pay hush money to influence the 2016 campaign, has garnered national attention. Daniels, a porn star, testified for two days, discussing an alleged encounter with Trump in 2006, which he denies.

Following her testimony, Trump's legal team, led by Todd Blanche, announced that McDougal, another key figure in the alleged hush money scandal, would not be called by the prosecution to testify. The reasons behind this decision remain undisclosed.

The Legal Implications of McDougal's Absence

Legal analysts speculate that the testimony from Daniels might have played a role in the decision to not pursue McDougal's testimony. The effectiveness of Daniels' testimony and its impact on the jury could be a factor in this strategic shift by the prosecution.

McDougal had been expected to discuss her own experiences and interactions with Trump, echoing themes similar to those Daniels described.

Daniels' Testimony Highlights

Daniels detailed her alleged encounter with Trump at a Lake Tahoe resort, a claim that Trump has consistently denied. This testimony was crucial as it relates directly to the $130,000 payment made by Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, ostensibly to prevent Daniels from publicizing her story.

The case also references additional alleged payments and suppressed stories, including those involving McDougal and a fabricated account from a former Trump Tower doorman who claimed Trump fathered a child out of wedlock. These allegations frame the broader narrative of a "catch-and-kill" strategy employed during Trump's campaign.

Developments in Court Procedures

In court, Blanche highlighted the prosecution's change of course with McDougal. “We have been informed the People no longer intend to call Karen McDougal as a witness,” he stated, indicating a pivotal shift in the trial's proceedings.

This announcement followed a turbulent week in court, where Judge Juan Merchan was urged by Blanche to declare a mistrial based on the prejudicial trajectory of the proceedings. The judge had previously issued a gag order preventing Trump from speaking publicly about the witnesses, which includes Daniels and potentially McDougal.

Political and Public Reactions

The trial's proceedings have not only legal but also significant political implications, considering the high-profile nature of the defendant and the potential influence of these allegations on his past presidential campaign.

The public and media reactions to the unfolding events have been mixed, with discussions about the legal strategies of both the defense and the prosecution dominating headlines.

Broader Context of the Hush Money Allegations

The hush money trial in New York has put a spotlight on the methods allegedly used by Trump and his associates to suppress damaging stories during the 2016 campaign. The term "catch-and-kill" used in this context refers to the practice of purchasing a story to prevent its publication.

McDougal's recent social media post, which featured her in a bathtub with the book Catch and Kill by Ronan Farrow, seems to play into the narrative she has been woven into by both the media and legal proceedings surrounding the former president.

Future Directions and Legal Challenges

As the trial progresses, the absence of McDougal's testimony remains a significant talking point. The decisions made in the coming days by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg will likely shape the trajectory of this high-stakes legal battle.

The defense's request for Trump to respond directly to Daniels's testimony in court underscores the contentious nature of the trial. With each development, the implications for both Trump's legacy and the legal precedents being set are profound.

Conclusion and Summary of Key Points

In conclusion, the trial of Donald Trump in New York continues to develop with Karen McDougal's planned testimony now canceled following Stormy Daniels' appearance in court.

This move by the prosecution could signal a strategic pivot or a reassessment of their case against the former president.

The implications of this trial, both legally and politically, are immense as it touches on themes of credibility, media influence, and electoral integrity.