In a significant revelation, a whistleblower has claimed that the FBI embarked on an unofficial probe into Donald Trump's activities soon after he announced his candidacy for the White House in June 2015.

The whistleblower's disclosure alleges that then-FBI Director James Comey spearheaded an off-the-record operation targeting Trump's presidential campaign to uncover incriminating information, without any formal justification or documentation, as the Post Millennial reports.

The covert nature of the FBI's operation targeting Donald Trump's 2016 campaign has emerged as a startling development. Initiated in June 2015, the investigation reportedly sought to dig up evidence against Trump without targeting any specific crime.

FBI's Covert Probe Said to Have Lacked Proper Documentation

The whistleblower allegations point to Comey's direct involvement in orchestrating the probe. It is claimed that he bypassed the protocols that demand proper legal grounding and official documentation for such investigations. Contrary to standard procedures, this secretive operation was kept off official FBI file system such as Sentinel.

In addition to the lack of legal predication, the probe is alleged to include two undercover agents, described in the revelations as "honeypots," who infiltrated Trump's campaign. These agents reportedly integrated themselves at high levels, even accompanying Trump and his team on their travels.

Notably, George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser, was presumably a specific target within this covert operation. Papadopoulos later confessed to making false statements to the FBI and received a presidential pardon from Trump in 2020.

New Details Emerge on Undercover Agents

The secret investigation, as reported, continued until a newspaper obtained a compromising photograph of one of the undercover agents, posing a risk of exposure. To mitigate this threat, the FBI purportedly instructed the press that the individual in question was merely an informant whose identity must remain protected for safety reasons.

The disclosure from the whistleblower suggests that internal measures were taken within the FBI to cover up the operation's existence. It alleges that the FBI personnel involved were explicitly told to refrain from discussing it, even amongst themselves.

Furthermore, it is alleged that to protect the operation's secrecy, one involved agent was reassigned to the CIA, which would potentially place her beyond the reach of future inquiries. Another FBI employee involved reportedly received a promotion.

House Judiciary Committee Intent on Investigation

The particulars of this secretive probe have prompted members of the House Judiciary Committee to announce their interest in investigating the allegations. They have expressed a commitment to thoroughly examine the details brought to light by the whistleblower.

Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker has strongly criticized the operation, calling it "an egregious violation" of the FBI's rules. He emphasized that any operation of this nature should have been properly documented and justified, especially given its sensitive nature targeting a presidential campaign.

Swecker stressed that regardless of the operation's nature, it required the keeping of official records, highlighting the stark procedural breaches implied in the whistleblower's claims.

Operations Throughout Trump's Candidacy

The whistleblower's allegations also detail the support from high-ranking FBI officials in this off-the-books investigation. Deputy Director Dave Bowdich and Paul Abbate, assistant director of the Washington field office, were reportedly involved in assisting Comey with the covert initiative.

As the allegations continue to unfold, questions about the legitimacy and ethical considerations of the investigation remain. The claims not only put the FBI's procedural adherence under scrutiny but also raise broader concerns about the oversight of intelligence agencies.

With the House Judiciary Committee stepping in to unravel the complexities of these assertions, continued public and political interest is anticipated, setting the stage for a potential inquiry with wide-reaching implications.

Implications of the Whistleblower Allegations

The whistleblower's disclosure is poised to ignite discussions about the boundary between national security, election integrity, and executive oversight. It presents a scenario that could challenge perceptions of law enforcement's role in political affairs.

Comey, although no longer in his role, finds his actions under historical inquiry once more. The unfolding investigation is likely to reignite debates about political neutrality and accountability within federal agencies.

This situation underscores the importance of transparency and adherence to protocol in safeguarding the balance between security measures and democratic principles.