A public feud has ignited between the White House and entertainer Selena Gomez after the singer shared an emotional video concerning the deportations of illegal immigrants.

The now-deleted Instagram video left Gomez open to criticism from the Trump administration and conservative commentators, highlighting her perceived bias in focusing on deportations rather than crimes perpetrated by illegal immigrants, as Fox News reports.

Earlier this week, Gomez stirred controversy by posting a tearful video on her Instagram account. The emotional footage captured her lamenting the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids targeting illegal immigrants with criminal records.

Gomez expressed deep sorrow, stating, “All my people are getting attacked, the children. I don’t understand. I’m so sorry. I wish I could do something, but I can’t.”

White House, Others Respond to Video

The White House promptly responded, with official accounts, including that of press Ssecretary Karoline Leavitt, publicly calling out Gomez. The administration’s response cited crimes involving illegal immigrants as a counterpoint to Gomez’s focus on deportation.

A significant portion of the response centered on referencing three murder victims: Kayla Hamilton, Jocelyn Nungaray, and Rachel Morin. The White House highlighted these cases to underscore concerns about illegal immigration and questioned why Gomez had not expressed similar sympathy for these victims or their families.

In a post shared on Friday, the White House included a video featuring the mothers of these victims. The mothers criticized Gomez for her emotional reaction, questioning its sincerity and pointing out the violent actions committed by the immigrants in question.

Criticism of Gomez on Fox News

Tom Homan, a former acting director of ICE and current border czar, also criticized Gomez during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s Hannity. He pointed to the trafficking of children into the U.S. as another significant issue associated with illegal immigration.

Homan argued that over half a million children have been trafficked into the country and remain unaccounted for. He questioned Gomez’s lack of similar public concern for these trafficked children, asking, “Where’s the tears for them?”

Victims' Families Seek Justice

The mothers mentioned in the White House post expressed their grief and frustration over the loss of their children. Tammy Nobles, the mother of Kayla Hamilton, asked, “What about our children who were brutally murdered and raped and beat to death and left on the floor by these illegal immigrants?”

Their testimonies underscored the devastating impact of criminal acts committed by some illegal immigrants, contrasting with Gomez’s focus on deportation impacts. Patty Morin shared her skepticism of Gomez’s intentions, stating that she believed the video was “a ruse to deceive people and garner sympathy for lawlessness.”

White House Shares Mothers' Critique

The clip of these mothers criticizing Gomez was shared by Leavitt on her government account. Leavitt directly tagged Gomez in the post, ensuring she would see their message.

Alexis Nungaray, whose daughter Jocelyn was a victim of migrant crime, expressed doubt about the genuineness of Gomez’s emotions. She remarked, “Seeing that video it’s hard to believe that it’s actually genuine and real because she’s an actress.”

Broader Debate on Immigration Takes Spotlight

The ongoing conflict highlights a broader debate on immigration policies in the U.S. The Trump administration has continually expressed a strong stance against illegal immigration and prioritized national security.

Gomez’s video, however, reflects a more empathetic concern for families affected by ICE raids. This juxtaposition illustrates the complex dynamics of public opinion surrounding immigration enforcement and the human stories within that framework.

Future Implications for Public Figures

The clash raises questions about the role of celebrities in political and social discourse. As public figures wield considerable influence, their messages and stances can significantly sway public perception and conversation.

The debate over immigration policy is likely to persist, with opinions sharply divided on both sides of the issue. Gomez’s actions and the administration’s responses underscore the sensitive nature of immigration discussions in the U.S.

What Lies Ahead in Debate

While Gomez has removed her initial post, the discussion it sparked continues to reverberate through social media and traditional news platforms. The public response may influence how both celebrities and policymakers address controversial issues moving forward.

As the conversation evolves, the impact on immigration policy, public opinion, and the role of social media will be critical areas to watch. Both sides are likely to continue advocating for their respective perspectives in the ongoing national dialogue on immigration reform.