DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

MN National Guard: Tim Walz’s Final Rank Reduced Just Before Retirement

 August 19, 2024

New revelations have surfaced about Gov. Tim Walz’s military rank at retirement, sparking controversy amidst his vice-presidential campaign.

 The discrepancy over the final military rank of Walz -- which was reduced just prior to his official retirement -- has cast a shadow on his claims made along the campaign trail and before, as Breitbart reports.

Initial Promise and Commencement of Military Career

Walz, the current governor of Minnesota and the 2024 Democratic Party vice-presidential candidate, enlisted in the Minnesota National Guard as a young man. His military career, dotted with various achievements, eventually placed him in a position to potentially become a command sergeant major.

Army Col. Ryan Cochran noted that Walz received his eligibility notification for retirement on Aug. 3, 2002, which marked a transitional period in his military service.

On Sept. 17, 2004, Walz was promoted to sergeant major (E-9) and began his tenure as the command sergeant major for the 1st Battalion, 125th Field Artillery, a role approved by the National Guard Bureau on April 1, 2005.

Academic Requirements and Rank Adjustment

The rise to the rank of command sergeant major typically requires the completion of specific coursework from the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy. However, Walz did not make progress toward fulfilling this prerequisite.

On the verge of retirement, it was determined that Walz had not completed the necessary coursework. Consequently, on May 15, 2005, a day before his official retirement, his rank was adjusted to master sergeant (E-8).

This adjustment was confirmed by military records that were formally corrected on Sept. 10, 2005, signifying a notable change from his initially reported and claimed the rank of command sergeant major.

Public Claims vs. Military Records

Despite the administrative rank reduction, Walz continued to publicly claim he retired as a command sergeant major. This contradiction was especially prominent during his congressional career and featured in a political advertisement in 2006.

In response to the emerging discrepancies, the Harris-Walz campaign recently updated Walz's biography to accurately reflect that he served only provisionally in the command sergeant major role.

The controversy extended beyond his rank claims. In 2018, Walz misspoke in a video, stating he had carried weapons in war, although he had never been deployed to a combat zone or participated in wartime activities.

Allegation of Avoiding Deployment

Adding to the scrutiny, allegations emerged from peers within the military. Retired Army Command Sergeant Major Doug Julin shared with CNN that Walz had assured him of leading their battalion into Iraq but sought early retirement instead.

These claims suggest that Walz might have retired to avoid deployment, although this has not been conclusively proven. The timing of his retirement, closely following his promotional appointment and his subsequent administrative rank reduction, raised questions among some colleagues.

The allegations and the factual adjustments to his military record have added a layer of complexity to Walz's political narrative, already under examination due to his vice-presidential candidacy.

Reflection on Political and Military Intersection

The intersection of Walz's military service and political career has become a focal point for scrutiny and reflection. The adjustments and revelations concerning his military rank and the timing around his retirement have sparked discussions on the accuracy and integrity of public figures in their recounting of personal histories.

This situation underscores the broader implications when personal achievement narratives in political contexts are misaligned with documented facts.

As the public and voters continue to observe this unfolding story, the importance of transparency and consistency in the portrayal of one's professional and service records remains clear.

To summarize, Gov. Tim Walz's intended retirement rank of command sergeant major was adjusted to master sergeant due to unmet academic requirements. His prior claims regarding his rank and military experiences have brought both scrutiny and significant media attention, complicating an already contentious electoral campaign.