DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Musk Demands Resignation of Secret Service Chief After Trump Assassination Attempt

 July 14, 2024

An assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump Saturday night has sparked controversy and calls for major resignations within the Secret Service.

During a political rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, a disturbing assassination attempt was made against former President Donald Trump, and now Elon Musk is demanding accountability from the Secret Service, as Newsmax reports.

The incident occurred as Trump addressed his supporters in the Keystone State. An eyewitness video later surfaced, capturing a suspicious individual on a rooftop opposite the rally site, armed with a rifle.

Elon Musk Reacts to Security Failure

Following the assassination attempt, technology magnate Elon Musk publicly demanded the resignation of key security officials. Musk specifically targeted the head of the Secret Service, Kimberly Cheatle, and the leader of the security staff present at the rally.

"The head of the Secret Service and the leader of this security detail should resign," Musk stated emphatically in his comment.

The call for the resignation of Musk was intensified by the circulation of the eyewitness video, which showed the potential shooter. This video was widely discussed across media platforms after Musk highlighted it.

Secret Service Under Scrutiny

The Secret Service, led by Cheatle, immediately faced significant public and political pressure. Cheatle, appointed head of the Secret Service, reports directly to Alejandro Mayorkas, the secretary of Homeland Security.

An eyewitness at the scene captured the critical video and promptly alerted the Secret Service about the suspicious figure. This video later became a pivotal piece of evidence spotlighted by Musk.

Despite the quick reporting by the eyewitness, the event has raised serious questions about the effectiveness and responsiveness of the Secret Service under such critical circumstances.

Controversial Decisions by Homeland Security

Further complicating the narrative, Mayorkas, has recently made headlines for denying Secret Service protection to presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

This decision was made despite the tragic history of assassinations within the Kennedy family.

"I have consulted with an advisory committee composed of the Speaker of the House, the House Minority Leader, the Senate Majority Leader, the Senate Minority Leader, and the Senate Sergeant at Arms. Based on the facts and the recommendation of the advisory committee, I have determined that Secret Service protection for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is not warranted at this time," Mayorkas explained.

This decision has sparked debate over the criteria and fairness of protective services allocated to public figures, particularly in light of the recent assassination attempt on Trump.

Public Reaction and Future Implications

The public and media reaction to both the assassination attempt and the subsequent demands for resignation by Musk has been intense. Discussions have pivoted on the safety of public figures and the accountability of those tasked with their protection.

The incident has not only exposed potential vulnerabilities in the protection strategies employed by the Secret Service but also highlighted the complex interplay of politics, security, and public perception.

As the situation unfolds, the effectiveness of the Secret Service and the decisions of Homeland Security continue to be under a microscope, with many calling for reforms and reassessment of security protocols.

Conclusion: A Rally That Became a Turning Point

In conclusion, the assassination attempt on Donald Trump during the Butler rally, the subsequent demands for resignation by Elon Musk, and the controversial decision by Mayorkas have intertwined to spotlight significant issues within national security measures.

The effectiveness of the Secret Service, the judgment of Homeland Security leadership, and the role of public and political pressure in such events have been called into question, setting the stage for potential changes in how protection and security are managed in the United States.