In a stunning display of defiance, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has refused to retract her harsh comments about conservative commentator Charlie Kirk following his tragic assassination, as the New York Post reports.

The controversy erupted after Omar doubled down on her stance, rejecting any tribute to Kirk’s legacy while facing sharp criticism from figures like former President Donald Trump.

The incident that sparked this debate occurred when Charlie Kirk was fatally shot by a sniper while engaging in a debate with students in Utah. A close-up video captured the shocking moment of his death, amplifying public attention on the event.

Shortly after, Omar made remarks that stirred significant backlash, stating she felt no need to express regret for her views.

Omar's unyielding stance

During an appearance on Don Lemon’s YouTube show, Omar declared, “I have nothing to apologize for.”

While acknowledging the personal loss, she added, “You know, it is a tragedy that Charlie Kirk was killed in that way. I feel for his widow and his children.” She continued, “They will have to live with that for the rest of their lives.”

Lawmaker's harsh words for Kirk

Despite her sympathy for Kirk’s family, Omar firmly rejected any positive portrayal of his contributions, saying, “But there is no legacy to honor.”

She further described his impact as rooted in “bigotry, hatred, and white supremacy,” particularly citing her perspective as a Black and Muslim woman.

Omar insisted she would not rewrite history to comfort others, emphasizing her refusal to join in tributes she deemed undeserved.

Defiance amid outrage

In her comments, Omar made it clear she would not be swayed, stating she refused to be “bullied into complacency” or to compromise her principles.

In a separate interview with Zeteo, she dismissed notions of Kirk as a figure of civil discussion, saying, “There are a lot of people who are talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate. These people are full of s—t and it’s important for us to call them out while we feel anger and sadness.”

She also criticized the idea that Kirk’s actions over the past decade could be overlooked, calling such narratives deeply flawed.

Broader reactions, political fallout emerge

Omar escalated her critique on social media, posting a video on X where she condemned Democrats and celebrities for attempting to soften Kirk’s image. She labeled him a “reprehensible human being” and accused him of using harmful rhetoric online for years.

In response, former President Donald Trump weighed in, recounting a conversation with Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud where he suggested Omar be sent back to her native country.

Trump shared that he had told Mohamud, “I met the head of Somalia, did you know that? And I suggested that maybe he’d like to take her back.” He added that Mohamud responded, “And he said, ‘I don’t want her.’”

This exchange added another layer of political friction to an already charged situation surrounding Omar’s statements.

Public discourse, personal tragedy

The assassination of Kirk, a prominent conservative voice, has raised questions about safety in public debates, especially given the graphic nature of the incident.

Meanwhile, Omar’s focus remains on what she sees as the negative aspects of his influence, refusing to align with those who mourn him as a figure of civil engagement. As this story unfolds, the clash between personal tragedy and public critique continues to dominate discussions in political circles.