Jen Psaki, a former press secretary in the Biden administration and now a host on MSNBC, has voiced her thoughts on the shortcomings of her own political party's communication strategies.

During a discussion with Jon Stewart, Psaki called out the Democratic Party for its failure to communicate in terms that resonate with voters, as Fox News reports.

Psaki's blunt remarks came during her appearance on Jon Stewart’s The Weekly Show podcast, where she opened up about her concerns regarding how Democrats convey their messages.

She accused the party of using language that stems from "academic and elitist" backgrounds that fail to connect with everyday people. This critique points to a gap in political messaging as the 2024 elections draw closer.

Psaki Retires from Party's Messaging

The former White House spokesperson shared that she has "retired from the world of Democratic messaging," clearly revealing her detachment from current strategies.

While on the podcast, Psaki detailed the ineffective communication by noting that Democrats employed terms such as "authoritarianism is under threat" and "democracy is on the ballot" which do not resonate with ordinary voters.

She described these expressions as belonging to an "Ivory Tower" approach, further indicating a disconnect between the political elite and the general populace.

Moreover, she strongly advised against the use of jargon such as "authoritarianism" and "oligarchy" in their messaging, urging the party to focus on the issues that people "actually care about." Psaki elaborated, “Nobody talks this way,” urging her party to reconsider language choices that alienate potential supporters.

Throughout the conversation, Stewart also questioned the Democrats’ response -- or rather, the lack thereof -- to pressing Republican policy moves and their consequences. This sentiment underscores a larger frustration with how the party navigates its rhetoric and actions.

Discussion on Recent Democratic Party Shortcomings

Psaki did not mince her words about the party's failures in the wake of recent elections. She addressed the Democrats' inability to adequately respond to policy implementations from the Trump administration, particularly those relating to program cuts and direct impacts on the electorate. This lack of reaction has prompted questions about the party's understanding of its current position.

Additionally, Stewart added another layer to the discussion by critiquing what he perceives as undemocratic tendencies within the Democratic Party.

He recalled instances from the 2016 elections where the party seemingly placed "their foot on the scales" to favor Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, signaling persistent issues of fairness within the party.

During the dialogue, Psaki lamented that the Democrats have "lost everything," observing their diminished influence and control. In stark terms, she articulated a call to action for the party, stating that it’s time to "break some [stuff]" for a reset in strategy.

Stewart's View on Progressive Politicians

As the conversation unfolded, Stewart shared his inclinations towards more progressive politicians like Sanders, highlighting a potential direction for future Democratic Party efforts.

Stewart's naming of Bernie Sanders as a figure of interest introduces a contrast between current party leaders and those advocating for significant reform.

Psaki, though retired from direct messaging roles, shared Stewart’s concern about the entrenched nature of the party’s tactics. Her reflection on how Democrats have approached communication emphasizes the necessity to evolve and connect authentically with voters.

The dialogue between Psaki and Stewart brought forward intricate critiques of the Democratic Party's actions, serving as a stark reminder of the need for effective communication.

As the party gears up for the next electoral cycle, it faces the challenge of refining its narrative without losing sight of the diversity in the voter base it aims to represent.