Oprah Winfrey found herself stepping in during a recent livestream event to press Vice President Kamala Harris for more specific answers on border security issues.

In a two-hour virtual event, Winfrey had to intervene multiple times to coax clear responses from Vice President Kamala Harris on her border security strategies after seeming to judge the VP's prior attempts to be abbreviated and insufficient, as Breitbart reports.

Star-Studded Livestream Attracts Attention

The event, dubbed Unite for America, was hosted by Oprah Winfrey and included virtual appearances by celebrities such as Chris Rock, Ben Stiller, and Jennifer Lopez. It aimed to rally support and engage discussion around key national issues.

However, as the event unfolded, it became clear that Vice President Harris was struggling to provide direct answers to pointed questions from the audience, who participated from afar due to the virtual format of the meeting.

One particular moment of awkwardness occurred when a young man asked about specific measures to strengthen U.S. border security under her administration.

Oprah Steps in During Key Discussion

Responding to the question, Harris offered a lengthy discourse on her past experience and the broader implications of a proposed border security bill, without detailing immediate steps she would take.

She reflected on her background as a prosecutor and former attorney general of California, emphasizing her commitment to secure borders and protect American citizens.

"So, it’s a wonderful and important question. I, you know, my background was as a prosecutor, and I was also the elected Attorney General for two terms of a border state. So, this is not a theoretical issue for me. This is something I’ve actually worked on," Harris explained.

Oprah's Interventions Highlight Frustration

Oprah, seeking to steer the conversation back to direct responses, interjected to remind Harris of the need for specificity. "Good job, girlfriend. You backfilled your answer with your experience," Oprah commented, pushing for more pointed answers.

Harris then blamed the failed passage of a significant border security bill on former President Donald Trump, asserting that his intervention prevented the bill from reaching the floor for a vote. This bill, according to Harris, would have significantly increased the number of border agents and provided them with much-needed support.

"He blocked the bill, and you know why? Because he preferred to run on the problem instead of fixing the problem," Harris stated, attempting to redirect the blame for current border issues.

Oprah's Frustration Becomes Evident

As the discussion continued, Oprah's frustration became more evident, her interjections sharper. "Blaming Trump is good. I forgot about that. But let’s get to the specifics before the questioner falls asleep on his feet," she quipped, pressing Harris for more than just historical context.

Harris responded with assurances that the blocked bill had provisions crucial for combating issues like fentanyl trafficking, underscoring the importance of such measures.

"The bill would’ve allowed us to have more resources to prosecute transnational criminal organizations. And it would’ve been part of the solution," she elaborated.

Oprah, however, summed up the interaction with a pointed remark aimed at moving the conversation forward. "Got it! We all got it. I swear, we got it. Now you’re going to answer, right?" she challenged.

Event Conclusion Leaves Questions Unanswered

The event concluded with Oprah directly asking Harris if she intended to introduce similar legislation to the one that had failed. Harris’s simple reply, "Absolutely," seemed to offer a promise of action, though many specifics remained undiscussed.

Throughout the event, Winfrey's role transitioned from host to a more active participant, reflecting a need to ensure meaningful dialogue and accountability in political discussions, particularly on critical issues like border security.

This intervention by Oprah not only highlighted the challenges moderators face in eliciting straightforward answers from politicians but also underscored the complexities of addressing border security in a politically polarized environment.