In a stunning turn of events, prominent voices have called on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to mend his strained relationship with former President Donald Trump or resign.

Marc A. Thiessen, a well-known columnist and supporter of Ukraine, has led criticisms against Zelensky following a discordant meeting with Trump, Daily Mail reported.

The meeting, initially meant to strengthen diplomatic efforts and finalize a critical minerals agreement, unexpectedly deteriorated into a public clash. Thiessen, known for his pro-Ukraine stance, has expressed his dissatisfaction with Zelensky's actions during the encounter.

During the meeting, Zelensky reportedly fact-checked Trump, a move that sparked criticism. According to Thiessen, this action was an error in judgment. The columnist remarked that the Ukrainian leader's behavior in such a high-profile meeting was unwise.

Thiessen's Criticism of Zelensky's Conduct

Thiessen accused Zelensky of mishandling the situation with Trump. In his view, Zelensky's alleged error in managing the meeting jeopardized efforts to reinforce ties between the two nations. Thiessen emphasized that Trump's restraint from criticizing Zelensky on issues such as his attire during the meeting should have been perceived more positively.

Adding to the controversy, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Senator Lindsey Graham also voiced concerns over Zelensky's diplomatic tactics. Rubio underscored the circumstances surrounding the meeting, arguing that greater understanding is necessary beyond what transpired publicly.

Rubio and Graham Express Their Views

Rubio shared that Zelensky bears responsibility for turning the situation into disarray. His comments highlighted the broader implications of the conflict and the significance of maintaining diplomatic poise.

Senator Graham commented on the aftermath of the meeting, focusing on the impact on the critical minerals deal. He lamented that progress on this vital economic collaboration with the United States was effectively nullified by the meeting's fallout.

Zelensky, in a subsequent interview, stood by his actions. He maintained that he had not committed any missteps and redirected attention toward Trump's stance in the negotiations. The Ukrainian president insisted that dialogue between the countries ought to be honest and direct.

The Call for Zelensky's Apology or Resignation

Zelensky refrained from offering any apology, further questioning what he termed as an unnecessary uproar. Rubio stressed Zelensky’s need to issue an apology for the meeting's failure and suggested that Zelensky reconsider his approach to diplomacy.

Graham, echoing similar sentiments, suggested Zelensky evaluate his position vis-à-vis the United States. According to Graham, Zelensky should either resign or reassess his diplomatic strategies to align with U.S. expectations.

The Ukrainian leader defended his stance, expressing that he wants to witness increased U.S. support for Ukraine. He highlighted the broader importance of peace, representing a lasting objective beyond mere cessation of conflict.

Escalating Tensions Amid Diplomatic Strains

Zelensky also stressed that ongoing tensions between the leaders are counterproductive for both countries. Moreover, he highlighted that the relationship transcends the presidents, reflecting strong ties between the Ukrainian and American peoples.

Nevertheless, despite the diplomatic turmoil, Zelensky continued to call for a peaceful resolution. Calling for understanding and cooperation, he reiterated his commitment to these enduring alliances and their foundational values.

As a result, the fallout from the meeting has strained relations, and pressures are mounting on Zelensky to reconsider his diplomatic approaches. Meanwhile, as the situation evolves, both nations grapple with the implications of this unexpected diplomatic setback. Ultimately, the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations hangs in the balance, with diplomatic repair efforts being of paramount importance.