DOJ moves to revoke citizenship from 17 naturalized immigrants who hid crimes

By Samuel Lee on
 June 9, 2026
category: 

The Department of Justice filed civil denaturalization cases against 17 naturalized citizens who concealed serious criminal conduct, from healthcare fraud to child sexual abuse, during the citizenship process, marking the largest coordinated push in modern memory to enforce honesty standards for those seeking American citizenship.

The cases, detailed in a DOJ announcement, target individuals from nine countries who lied under oath or hid disqualifying crimes while their naturalization applications were pending. The charges span a wide range of fraud, violence, and deception, and each defendant swore under penalty of perjury that they had committed no crimes for which they had not been arrested.

Every one of them, the government alleges, was lying.

What the cases reveal

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche framed the effort in blunt terms in a department statement:

"Gaining U.S. citizenship is a privilege and under the steadfast leadership of President Trump, this Department of Justice maintains a zero-tolerance policy for the abuse of this process."

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin echoed that position. "American citizenship is a privilege, and it must be earned honestly," Mullin said. "If you come here, break our laws, and lie in your immigration proceedings, you forfeit that privilege."

The 17 defendants are not accused of minor paperwork errors. The DOJ filings describe conduct that ranges from multimillion-dollar fraud schemes to the sexual abuse of a child, all of which allegedly occurred before or during the naturalization process and was deliberately hidden from immigration officials.

The cases, one by one

Consider the scope. Leidys Delmas Garcia, a 54-year-old native of Cuba, admitted in criminal proceedings that she and co-conspirators set up 30 fraudulent physical therapy clinics in Florida. They billed Blue Cross Blue Shield roughly $36.7 million for services that were either medically unnecessary or never provided. During her naturalization interview, she swore she had not committed crimes for which she had not been arrested. She also swore she had never given false or misleading information to a government official while applying for an immigration benefit.

Neither statement was true.

Jean Claude Alfred, a 68-year-old native of Haiti who naturalized in 1994, began sexually abusing his minor daughter in September 1993, approximately one month before filing his naturalization application. The abuse continued while his case was pending. He concealed his conduct under oath.

Andrea Marroquin, 44, from Colombia, inherited money from her father, described in the filing as a major Colombian drug trafficker. She obtained permanent residence by concealing a bigamous marriage to a U.S. citizen, then conspired between 2003 and 2011 to commit wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering, using her father's drug proceeds to finance fraudulent real estate deals in Miami.

Talman Harris, 49, from Jamaica, ran a stock manipulation conspiracy over eight years, including during his 2012, 2014 naturalization proceedings. The scheme caused more than $54 million to be invested in artificially controlled shares and resulted in approximately $39 million in losses to investors.

Fraud across industries and borders

Neeraj Sharma, 50, from India, owned and ran Magnavision LLC, a New Jersey staffing company. He signed and filed eleven fraudulent H-1B visa petitions with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, abusing the very immigration system that had granted him entry.

Abdikadir Ali Kadiye, 54, from Somalia, sought admission to the United States in 1997 by filing applications under two separate identities. Ronnie Price, 40, from Trinidad and Tobago, had sexual intercourse with a female under 16 before his 2016 naturalization, statutory rape, to which he eventually pleaded guilty. He told naturalization officials he had never committed a crime for which he had not been arrested and testified to the same under oath.

Rodger George Gurdon, 55, from Jamaica, conspired to steal and resell medical products from military hospitals operated by the Department of Defense before naturalizing in 2011. Milagros Marileisis Acosta Torres, 40, from Cuba, participated in a conspiracy to defraud a tribal casino in Florida, where her husband and others stole millions through false credit vouchers.

These are not edge cases. They are textbook examples of people who gamed a system built on trust, and got away with it for years.

A small number, but a large signal

Pro-migration advocate Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council characterized the effort as modest in scale:

"The expansion of denaturalization remains very small in scale. 17 people is a significant increase from historical efforts, true, but represents around 0.00006% of the total naturalized population."

That framing misses the point. The significance of these 17 cases is not the number, it is the nature of the crimes. Past denaturalization efforts focused almost exclusively on war criminals and concentration camp guards. These new filings target commonplace fraud, sex crimes, drug money laundering, and stock manipulation. They establish a precedent that the government will pursue denaturalization for ordinary criminal deception, not just the most extreme international atrocities.

If the DOJ applies this standard consistently, the universe of naturalized citizens potentially vulnerable to review expands dramatically. Federal law already permits the deportation of immigrants who committed deception during the citizenship process. But enforcement has been vanishingly rare. These 17 cases suggest that is changing.

The political stakes

The prospect of broader denaturalization enforcement will almost certainly provoke fierce resistance. Democrats have long treated naturalization as a one-way door, once granted, effectively irrevocable except in the most extreme circumstances. Expanding the standard to include garden-variety fraud and concealed felonies threatens that assumption and, with it, a constituency that immigration advocates have spent decades building.

The Trump administration is simultaneously raising the behavioral standard expected of applicants before naturalization and increasing the difficulty of the citizenship test. Together, these moves signal a broader shift: citizenship is not a formality to be completed as quickly as possible, but a privilege that demands honesty and lawful conduct at every stage.

The administration's posture on enforcement extends well beyond immigration courts. President Trump recently instructed ICE, Border Patrol, law enforcement, and the U.S. military to immediately arrest anyone burning the American flag, citing his August 25, 2025 executive order on flag desecration. As Fox News reported, the executive order directed the Justice Department to prioritize cases under existing laws rather than creating new penalties, a pattern consistent with the denaturalization push, which relies on statutes already on the books.

The common thread is enforcement of laws that previous administrations chose to ignore.

What the system missed, and for how long

The timelines in these cases are damning for the immigration bureaucracy. Alfred began abusing his daughter a month before filing his naturalization application and continued during the proceedings. Harris ran his stock fraud scheme for eight years, including the two years his naturalization case was active. Marroquin conspired to launder drug money for nearly a decade after obtaining permanent residence through a bigamous marriage.

In each instance, the system accepted sworn statements at face value and granted citizenship to people actively committing serious crimes. The naturalization process is supposed to include background checks, interviews, and oath-taking. For these 17 individuals, none of it caught the lies.

That failure belongs to the agencies and administrations that treated the citizenship pipeline as a volume operation rather than a vetting process. The current enforcement push is a corrective, but it also exposes how long the problem was allowed to fester.

The iceberg below the surface

Seventeen cases is a start. The real question is how many more are out there. If a $36.7 million healthcare fraud ring, a child sex abuser, a drug trafficker's heir laundering money through Miami real estate, and a $54 million stock manipulation conspiracy all slipped through the naturalization process undetected, what else did the system miss?

Nobody knows, and that is precisely the problem. The immigration system has processed millions of naturalizations over the past three decades with minimal post-approval scrutiny. The assumption was that the front-end vetting worked. These 17 cases prove it did not.

Whether the DOJ has the resources and political support to pursue denaturalization at any meaningful scale remains an open question. Democrats will frame the effort as an attack on immigrants. The administration will frame it as an attack on fraud. The facts in these filings, the fake clinics, the abused child, the stolen military supplies, the rigged stocks, speak for themselves.

Citizenship earned through perjury is citizenship built on a lie. Seventeen is a start. The honest question is why it took this long.

DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News