DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Supreme Court Rules On Immunity For Ex-Presidents, Aiding Trump's Campaign

 July 2, 2024

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has granted a least some degree immunity to former presidents from prosecution, significantly affecting former President Donald Trump as he eyes the 2024 presidential race.

The high court's recent decision provides a boon to Trump's campaign, as it gives him even stronger footing from which to challenge the criminal cases against him, as Fox News reports.

The opinion in the case titled Trump v. United States was issued on Monday when the Supreme Court announced a decision that clarified the extent of legal immunity for former presidents. The justices determined that while former presidents are shielded from prosecution for their official actions in office, this immunity does not extend to unofficial acts.

This 6-3 ruling has sent ripples through the political and legal communities, with many viewing it as a pivotal moment for presidential accountability.

The case has been remanded to a lower court to assess how this new standard applies to specific allegations against Trump, particularly his actions surrounding the 2020 election results.

Reactions to the Supreme Court Decision

Alina Habba, a senior adviser for Trump's 2024 campaign, appeared on Fox News' America's Newsroom, where she praised the Supreme Court's decision. She believes that the justices affirmed an important principle of presidential immunity that was previously noted in the case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald.

Habba argued consistently for Trump's immunity, asserting that recognizing absolute immunity is crucial for all presidents to perform their roles without fear of subsequent legal repercussions.

Additionally, Habba described the lawsuit against Trump as a "disgrace to America," indicating a strong dissatisfaction with the initial need for such a ruling.

Details from the Supreme Court's Majority Opinion

Chief Justice John Roberts, in his majority opinion, clarified the scope of this immunity. "The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official," he wrote, emphasizing the limits of presidential immunity.

Roberts further noted, "The President is not above the law. But Congress may not criminalize the President's conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution."

He elaborated that the separation of powers requires an independent Executive, thereby justifying a presumptive immunity for official acts of a president.

Trump's Response to the Ruling

In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, former President Trump expressed relief and vindication following the Supreme Court's ruling. He criticized the Democrat Party, including Joe Biden and Barack Obama, accusing them of long-standing harassment.

Trump viewed the decision as a victory for the Constitution and democracy, stating, "This is a big win for our Constitution and democracy. Now I am free to campaign like anyone else. We are leading in every poll—by a lot—and we will make America great again," he declared.

Trump's commentary underscores his perception of the ruling as not only a personal triumph but a corrective measure against what he terms political persecution.

Implications for Trump's Legal Challenges

While the ruling provides some clarity on the extent of immunity for former presidents, it also raises questions about ongoing legal challenges against Trump. Habba speculated that this decision might slow down what she describes as "persecution and selective prosecution" led by Jack Smith against the former president.

"I don't see how this case could go forward before the election," Habba commented, suggesting that the legal landscape might favor Trump in the short term.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court's decision marks a significant development in the legal boundaries of presidential immunity. It clarifies that while former presidents enjoy broad protection for actions taken within their official capacity, they remain accountable for personal conduct.

This ruling will likely impact not only Donald Trump's legal battles but also his campaign strategy as he prepares for the upcoming presidential election.